You may be interested in the following papers and the links below:
van Wynsberghe, A. “Service Robots, Care Ethics, and Design.” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 18, no. 4, 2016, pp. 311–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9409-x.
Stokes, Felicia, and Amitabha Palmer. “Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Nursing: Ethics of Caring as a Guide to Dividing Tasks Between AI and Humans.” Nursing Philosophy, vol. 21, no. 4, 2020, p. e12306–n/a, https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12306.
Broadbent, Elizabeth, et al. “Benefits and Problems of Health-Care Robots in Aged Care Settings: A Comparison Trial: Health-Care Robots in Retirement Village.” Australasian Journal on Ageing, vol. 35, no. 1, 2016, pp. 23–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12190.
Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs, et al. “How Do Older Adults Experience and Perceive Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care: a Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.” Aging & Mental Health, vol. 22, no. 2, 2018, pp. 149–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455.
van Wynsberghe, Aimee. “Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, no. 2, 2013, pp. 407–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6.
Kreps, David, et al. “The Ethics of Inherent Trust in Care Robots for the Elderly.” This Changes Everything - ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do?, vol. 537, Springer International Publishing AG, 2018, pp. 314–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_24.
Wynsberghe, Aimee van. “The Future Design of Care Robots: The Care-Centred Value-Sensitive Design Approach.” Healthcare Robots, Routledge, 2015, pp. 115–36, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315586397-13.
Umbrello, Steven, et al. “Value Sensitive Design to Achieve the UN SDGs with AI: A Case of Elderly Care Robots.” Minds and Machines (Dordrecht), vol. 31, no. 3, 2021, pp. 395–419, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09561-y.
Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel Sharkey. “Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly.” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, 2012, pp. 27–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.
Design and Engineering Requirements:
Van De Poel, Ibo, and A. C. Van Gorp. “The Need for Ethical Reflection in Engineering Design: The Relevance of Type of Design and Design Hierarchy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 31, no. 3, 2006, pp. 333–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285846.
van de Poel, Ibo. “Translating Values into Design Requirements.” Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, Springer Netherlands, 2013, pp. 253–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20.
Veluwenkamp, Herman, and Jeroen van den Hoven. “Design for Values and Conceptual Engineering.” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, 2023, p. 2–, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09675-6.
Vermaas, P. .., et al. “Designing for Trust: A Case of Value-Sensitive Design.” Knowledge in Society, vol. 23, no. 3-4, 2010, pp. 491–505, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9130-8.
Millar, J., et al. “A FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ENGINEERING OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES (AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES).” Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, vol. 1, 2020, pp. 1485–94, https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.78.
Sunstein, Cass R. “The Ethics of Nudging.” Yale Journal on Regulation, vol. 32, no. 2, 2015, pp. 413–50.
Overall Roboethics Papers
Link to Value Maps Samples